Chapter One
Democracy Before America
It is often said that America "invented" democracy. This view is, of
course, an understatement; America invented not only democracy, but
freedom, justice, liberty, and "time-sharing." But representative
democracy is unquestionably our proudest achievement, the creation
most uniquely our own, even if the rest of the Western world would
have come up with the idea themselves by the 1820s. So why, then,
has participation in this most wondrous system withered?
As heirs to a legacy more than two centuries old, it is
understandable why present-day Americans would take their own
democracy for granted. A president freely chosen from a wide-open
field of two men every four years; a Congress with a 99% incumbency
rate; a Supreme Court comprised of nine politically appointed judges
whose only oversight is the icy scythe of Death- all these reveal a
system fully capable of maintaining itself. But our perfect
democracy, which neither needs nor particularly wants voters, is a
rarity. It is important to remember there still exist many other
forms of government in the world today, and that dozens of foreign
countries still long for a democracy such as ours to be imposed on
them.
To regain our sense of perspective and wonder, we must take a
broader historical view, looking beyond America's relatively recent
success story to examine our predecessors and their adorable
failures. In this chapter, we will briefly explore the evolution of
an idea, following the H.M.S. Democracy on her dangerous voyage
through the mists of time, past the Straits of Monarchy, surviving
Hurricane Theocracy, then navigating around the Cape of Good Feudal
System to arrive, battered but safe, at her destined port-of-call:
Americatown.
Early Man: More Animal Than Political
The human race is by nature brutal, amoral, unreasonable and
self-centered, but for the first few hundred thousand years of our
existence as a species, we were way too obvious about it. Primitive
culture centered on survival of the individual and, occasionally,
survival of someone the individual might want to reproduce with (see
1981's harrowing documentary Caveman. Civic institutions were
non-existent, as was debate, which would appear later after the
invention of the frontal lobe. For prehistoric man the rule of law,
such as it was, could best be summed up by the seminal case
Marbury's Head v. Madison's Rock.
Early man lived this tenuous Darwinian nightmare for an age or two,
until a peculiar thing happened: The unfittest decided they wouldn't
mind surviving either. The feeble and weak realized that without a
good plan they weren't going to make it out of the Stone Age to see
the wonder that was clay. Alone, they were mammoth meat. Together,
they would become a force with a chance to see the day when their
children's children would be only 75% covered in hair. From these
noble impulses, the groundwork for the first civilizations was laid.
Athens: Our Big Fat Greek Forerunners
Ancient Greece is widely credited with creating the world's first
democracy. It would be a worthy endeavor to travel back in time to
the feta-strewn shores of fifth-century B.C. Athens and ask Plato to
define democracy, and not only to make money gambling on Olympics
results that we, being from the future, would already know. Plato
would tell us, in that affectionate but non-sexual way of his, that
"democracy" is a Greek word combining the roots for "people"
("demos-") and "rule" ("-kratia"). In Greek democracy, political
power was concentrated not in the hands of one person, or even a
small group of people, but rather evenly and fairly distributed
among all the people, meaning every John Q. Publikopolous could
play a role in Athenian government. The main legislative body, the
Assembly, was comprised of no less than the first 6,000 citizens to
arrive at its meetings-and bear in mind, no saving seats. Jury duty
was considered an honor to be vied for. Membership in most other
civic institutions, including the Supreme Court, was chosen ... by
lot! Imagine a system in which anyone could wind up serving on the
Supreme Court. Anyone. Think about your own family. Friends. The
guys you knew in college who would eat dog feces for ten dollars.
Now picture one of them as your randomly chosen Chief Justice, and
you'll appreciate just how fucked-up this system was.
Compared with American democracy, the Athenian version seems
simplistic, naive, and gay. Transcripts of early Athenian policy
debates reveal a populace moved more by eloquence and rationality
than demagogues and fear-mongering. Thankfully, this type of humane
governance wasn't allowed to take root. Athens's great experiment
ended after less than two centuries, when, in 338 B.C., Philip of
Macedon's forces invaded the city, inflicting on its inhabitants the
eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by
the armed and dumb.
Rome: The First Republicans
The fall of Athens was followed by the emergence, overnight, of
Rome. At first glance its people appear to have enjoyed a system of
representative government similar to ours. True, behind its faade
of allegedly "representative" officials lurked a de facto oligarchy
ruled by entrenched plutocrats. But the similarities don't end
there. In fact, the Founding Fathers borrowed many of their ideas
from the Roman model, including its bicameral legislature, its
emphasis on republicanism and civic virtue, and its Freudian
fascination with big white columns.
However, there was very little real democracy in Rome. While the
Senate theoretically represented the people, in reality its wealthy
members covertly pursued pro-business legislation on behalf of such
military-industrial giants as JavelinCorp, United Crucifix, and a
cartel of resource-exploiting companies known as Big Aqueduct. They
even monopolized the most notorious aspect of Roman life,
instituting an orgy policy that can literally be described as
"trickle-down."
Vomitoriums aside, Rome's biggest contribution to American
government was probably its legal system, which codified key
concepts like equal protection, "innocent until proven guilty," and
the right to confront one's accusers. These very same issues would
later form the basis of both the Bill of Rights and a mind-numbing
quantity of Law and Order scripts. But by the time of Rome's huge
millennium celebration marking the beginning of O A.D., the faint
light of Roman democracy was all but extinguished. The Republic had
given way to Empire. The only voting to speak of took place in the
Colosseum and was generally limited to a handful of
disembowelment-related issues. In time, the Empire itself fell, as
history teaches us all empires inevitably must. Its most enduring
legacy: a numerical system that allowed future generations to more
easily keep track of Super Bowls.
The Magna Carta: Power to the Extremely Wealthy People
And then, darkness. For more than 1,000 years democracy disappeared
from the European scene. The period instead saw the blossoming of an
exciting array of alternate forms of government, such as monarchy,
absolute monarchy, kingship, queenhood, and three different types of
oppression (religious/ethnic/"for shits and giggles"). As for
individual liberty, "innocent until proven guilty" was rapidly
supplanted by a more aggressive law-and-order approach better
characterized as "guilty until proven flammable."
Democracy had disappeared. The people needed a champion, and as is
usually the case, the obscenely rich rode to the rescue. In 1215,
England's wealthy barons refused to give King John the money he
needed to wage war unless he signed the Magna Carta. The document
codified that no man was above the law. Unfortunately for the
peasant class, it did little to address how many were below it.
Startlingly ahead of its time, this extraordinary document had a
profound effect on people and continues to shape
twenty-first-century views on topics as diverse as escheat, socage,
burage, novel disseisin, and the bailiwicks of Gerard of Athee. But
even more importantly, the Magna Carta set a powerful precedent for
our own Founding Fathers: There was no more powerful means of
safeguarding individual liberty than a vaguely worded manifesto
inked in inscrutable cursive on dilapidated parchment.
The Magna Carta served as a wake-up call that Europe would be forced
to answer-in about five hundred years. For Lady Democracy, having
lain dormant for more than a millennium, had risen from its slumber
only to stretch its arms, reach for the clock, and groggily set the
snooze bar for "The Enlightenment."
The 17th and 18th Centuries: Enlightening Strikes
Though a promising development for democracy, the Magna Carta was
mostly ignored as the world plunged into what would be known as the
Dark Ages. It was an apt title for an era when amoebic dysentery was
considered the good kind of dysentery. Oppression and high mortality
rates seemed ready to swallow what remained of mankind, when through
the darkness emerged the light that would be its salvation: Reason.
It began slowly. "Hey, what if we stop storing the corpses in the
drinking water and see if that makes any difference to our health?"
From there, it gathered momentum. Soon, all conventional wisdom,
from the shape of the Earth to whether the ruling class could have
your hut burned and your organs removed because they thought you
caused an eclipse, was up for grabs. This last question proved
especially pertinent for the future of democracy and ushered in an
era known as the Enlightenment.
The Enlightenment, with its emphasis on reason, would finally
provide democracy with its philosophical underpinnings. The 17th and
18th centuries produced a wave of prominent thinkers espousing
political systems based on what they called "the social contract."
Government, they theorized, was a sort of legal agreement between
the rulers and the ruled, the terms of which were binding on both
parties. It was a groundbreaking theory. All they needed now was
some country dumb enough to try it before the King found out and had
them all drawn and quartered.
Democracy needed a fresh start-hearty and idealistic champions who
would strike out for a new world, willing to risk everything for the
principles of equality, liberty, justice ... and slaves. We'd need
some slaves and guns. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. A new
world awaited.
Continues...
Excerpted from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Presents America (the Book)
by The Writers of the Daily Show
Copyright © 2005 by The Writers of the Daily Show.
Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Copyright © 2005
The Writers of the Daily Show
All right reserved.